Tchenguiz v Bird, 2022 WL 519174 (D. Montana, 2022)
Tchenguiz’s motion to strike was granted to the extent that Bird was prohibited from raising the “grave risk of harm” defense or introducing evidence or witnesses related to this defense at the hearing based in part on the lack of a mental evaluation and insufficient discovery responses from Bird. The court also recognized England as the child’s country of habitual residence. Motion denied insofar as Bird was permitted to present a “mature child” defense.
No comments:
Post a Comment